Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 3,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
This is solid proof that your vote matters. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:31 am
Balganesh: Rationalism is not inconsistent with saying “I’m just trying to make sense of the world. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm
Maybe someone is chilled from a favored use b/c litigation cost/risk exceeds benefit. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am
Copyright and real estate are different b/c of building and borrowing as key feature of creativity. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:31 am
B/c author saw the notice, can be inferred that he transferred the rights. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 8:17 am
Trolls are bad b/c raise tax caused by patent law/litigation. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:37 am
To say that the EU right to reside rules are politically contested is of course a given; but what politicians don’t seem to have cottoned on to is that they are also contested as a matter of law. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:27 pm
C. 1.5(b)(1). [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:27 pm
C. 1.5(b)(1). [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 11:58 am
Legislative support for it needed b/c every tech can be circumvented. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
L'avocate pénaliste Hannelore Cayre y faisait une peinture auvitriol de la« justicedes pauvres et des proxos », du côté de l'avocaten même temps que du côté du mis en examen. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
Sections 3(b)-(e) exempt some opinions and some honest mistakes, but not by any means all. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
While one might argue that the class action mechanism renders such knowledge defenses irrelevant as a matter of collateral estoppel, a class benefitting from the Basic presumption is never accurately defined merely as purchasers between dates “X and Y,” but rather should be defined as purchasers between dates “X + Y, who did not know or believe that the misrepresentation was false or that an omission occurred. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:19 pm
Simply as a matter of textual interpretation, I'm not so sure that Rule 11 is nearly as "plain" as Judge Murguia reads it.Today's opinion says that Rule 11(c)(1) is crystal clear since it prohibits "the court" from engaging in any plea negotiations. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 1:17 pm
Maybe, but I’m not sure. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:26 am
Class certification is not a ruling on the merits of the case, but only whether the case is one that there a sufficient similarities between all of the class members’ claims that enable to court to decide the matter on a class wide basis. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:22 pm
I'm not an expert on personality types. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:44 pm
C-13-3826 EMC (September 1, 2015). [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 8:11 am
(b) By a written instrument conveying the trust property signed by the settlor (c) By operation of law. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:22 am
I’m glad that the order has now been dissolved, and that Barbra Streisand continues to be doing her job. [read post]
