Search for: "P Plaintiff" Results 1781 - 1800 of 13,770
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Less than two days after filing the complaint, after a hearing at which the defendant-appellants were present and at which the plaintiff presented no testimony, the court issued an order that "enjoined" the appellants "from publicizing, through social media or other channels, Plaintiff's personal identifying information. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Lewin, 852 P.2d 44, 52 (Haw. 1993), their ruling was ridiculed and abandoned by liberals as well as conservatives, and rejected by an overwhelming popular majority, in the Aloha State. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Stockton, 2018 UT App 136, ¶ 8, 427 P.3d 1190 (quotation simplified). [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:31 am by Nicole Pottroff
Specifically, the plaintiffs argued that the Army violated the Rule of Two by “mov[ing] the unchanged requirements to the New Ft. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Of course, before the court will make a finding of publication, the plaintiff must also satisfy the requirements of the second component of publication on a balance of probabilities, namely, that the “defamatory matter [was] brought by the defendant or his agent to the knowledge and understanding of some person other than the plaintiff” (McNichol, at p. 704). [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:25 am by Jessica Engler
” This change increases the likelihood that trademark infringement plaintiffs will be awarded preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, decreasing overall litigation costs and evidentiary burdens on plaintiffs. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
  District Judge Amit P Mehta dismissed an action for libel by Representative Devin Nunes against the Washington Post because the plaintiff has not introduced sufficient evidence of “actual malice”. [read post]
After previously issuing a Draft EIR in 2012, and a Final EIR in 2017 for a 30-day review period which stated, “After the [FEIR] is circulated, if Caltrans decides to approve the [p]roject, a [NOD] will be published in compliance with CEQA by Caltrans . . . [read post]
After previously issuing a Draft EIR in 2012, and a Final EIR in 2017 for a 30-day review period which stated, “After the [FEIR] is circulated, if Caltrans decides to approve the [p]roject, a [NOD] will be published in compliance with CEQA by Caltrans . . . [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:04 pm by Administrator
The plaintiffs argue that the benefit can be more general, but they argue that in any event, there is a financial benefit in terms of the potential health benefits to society and reduction in healthcare costs to the government. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 2:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
-listed corporations and insurers expense to defend complex litigation against different cohorts of plaintiffs. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 8:51 am by Eric Goldman
Upholding eBay’s mandatory arbitration clause because the plaintiff did not follow the opt-out requirements specified in the clause. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 1:32 pm by Kate Cox
Not only were Powell's suits based on unfounded conspiracy theories, but they were also just plain bad filings in myriad other ways, including naming locations that didn't exist, misspelling ones that did, and naming plaintiffs who had not agreed to participate in the case.Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
This post summarizes published criminal decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on December 31, 2020. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 6:45 am by Samuel Bray
Whatever label is used, when a plaintiff prevails on a legal restitutionary claim, the court will award a judgment for a certain amount of money. [read post]