Search for: "P. v. Hard"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 2,629
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2011, 11:15 am
Acts p. 641;Mont. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:13 am
The agents seized Reed's laptop computer, a USB storage device, and three hard drives. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:38 pm
"Hard cases make bad law" goes the cliché.* But in the case of the Williamson County ripeness requirement in federal takings cases, the bad law is an entirely self-inflicted wound and cannot be blamed on lousy facts or hard cases. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:56 pm
But such a defense of the debate about mathematical analysis of evidence is a bit like saying that WWII was a good thing because it led to the development of V-2 rockets. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:50 am
Earlier today, in Bond v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:10 am
Lovett v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:50 pm
This indicated that the libel claim brought by a social worker involved in the “Baby P” case – due this week to be the first jury trial of 2011 – had been settled. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm
(I was sitting behind a small desk doing research -- the old-fashioned way, by reading cases in "hard copy" form.) [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:09 pm
of Cal. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:47 pm
Soon after VCRs entered the market, Hollywood tried very hard to control them (see Sony v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:32 pm
But, today, in Sykes v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:38 am
O’Reilly v Limerick Corporation [1989] ILRM 181 revolved around issues relating to the right of Traveller families living in a halting site to have access to running water, toilets, refuse collections and hard surfaces for their caravans. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:18 pm
Easy to say, hard to do. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:57 am
Count the Court’s decision today in McNeill v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm
This week in Ashcroft v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:12 am
P says they don’t need to make pellets to compete in the ice cream market, look at Ben & Jerry’s. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:27 pm
V. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:38 pm
In Zip International Group, LLC. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 12:38 pm
If judges are pressing too hard, I suggested the Commission could, in consultation with the Department, issue recommendations for court scheduling and case prioritization so as to permit adequate case-by-case assessment. [read post]
