Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC." Results 1781 - 1800 of 2,327
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Kazals sent hundreds of emails to David and his employees, hired protesters to picket and distribute flyers near his residence and business—Thunder Studios Inc., in Los Angeles—and had vans emblazoned with their message driven around the city. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 7:24 am by Vivien Chan
It is widely speculated that settlement will be reached by the two parties. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Beginning in November 2005, Marshall resided at and was treated at the defendant SLS Residential, Inc. [read post]
22 May 2011, 7:47 pm by Kevin Funnell
" you're not urging everyone at the pool party to jump in the water. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 11:48 am
Howe Chemical Co., Inc., 210 AD2d 62 [1st Dept 1994]; see also Matter of Freeman, 34 NY2d 1, 9 [1974]; Marshall v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:47 am
The United States Court of International Trade is located in the Federal Plaza of downtown Manhattan, near the Brooklyn Bridge-City Hall subway station. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[FN4] Further, plaintiff has sufficiently alleged that defendant provided negligent and careless counseling to plaintiff and did not possess the ordinary skill, knowledge, or ability of those holding themselves out to the public as marriage counselors. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Conor McEvily
  And in Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am by Maureen Johnston
City of Cambridge, and Village of Euclid v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am by Andrew Spillane
Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97, 105 (1980) (citing City of Lafayette v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
He now knows how Justice Kennedy feels about City of Boerne. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
Yet both the Supreme Court’s precedents and the large body of recent case law striking down campus speech codes hold that such university actions cannot be constitutional. [read post]