Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC." Results 1781 - 1800 of 2,327
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm by Sheppard Mullin
In 2006, the California Court of Appeal issued the first reported decision interpreting the scope of a beneficiary provision, City of Burbank ex rel. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
Medtronic, Inc., 623 F.3d 1200 (8th Cir. 2010) (we previously discussed Bryant here). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
Gregory, 822 S.W.2d 946, 949 (Mo.App. 1992).When a person, regardless of whether a party, is being questioned on the witness stand, then long-standing Missouri law holds that the person may be asked about specific instances of his or her own conduct that speak to his or her own character for truth or veracity, even when the issue inquired about is not material to the substantive issues in the case. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Stauffer is an Executive Vice President at Chartis, Inc. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 3:28 pm
City of New York, 414 F.3d 381, 391 (2d Cir. 2005). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
We hold that even if the settlement agreement had not been binding, appellants were judicially estopped from denying the enforceability of that agreement because they represented to the trial court that the case had settled and the trial court discharged the jury in reliance on that representation. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
We hold that even if the settlement agreement had not been binding, appellants were judicially estopped from denying the enforceability of that agreement because they represented to the trial court that the case had settled and the trial court discharged the jury in reliance on that representation. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Cuomo announced agreements with major Albany-based lobbyist Patricia Lynch Associates, Inc. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:00 pm by WIMS
"       Plaintiffs in the Second Circuit case involved the states of CT, NY, CA, IA, NJ, RI, VT, and WI plus New York City, Open Space Institute, Inc., Open Space Conservancy and the Audubon Society of New Hampshire. [read post]