Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 1781 - 1800
of 22,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2008, 8:45 pm
Although defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review, we exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see People v Fomby, 42 AD3d 894, 895; People v Valdez, 41 AD3d 1255, lv denied 9 NY3d 882).Last week, in People v Cambridge (2008 NY Slip Op 07435 [10/3/08]) the Court went a step further and corrected such an unpreserved error, in the interest of justice,… [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
Clancy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:26 pm
Doe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:15 am
"Justice & Scots expectations to the right of a fair trial is not like picking up a 2 for 1 at the local brewery : Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
” Justice Scalia spoke at length about this standard in his dissent from the denial of certiorari in the case of Ada v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 7:32 pm
Supreme Court building heard it when Chief Justice Earl Warren announced the historic Brown v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:01 am
… [Y]ou have repose under his theory, in the sense that you know what people are suing you about. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 1:35 pm
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson echoed Thomas’s sentiment. [read post]
7 May 2024, 11:46 am
” Case No. 01001976380 | The People of the State of California v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:24 am
As the discussion above should illustrate, the Justices seemed to receive the arguments through the same frame as they received the arguments last Term in Halliburton, when they considered, but ultimately rejected, the idea that they should overrule Basic v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 6:17 am
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia during a recent visit to London. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
Weeks v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 6:39 am
This is more-or-less Justice Ginsburg's Hobby Lobby dissent, and one possible reading of Cutter v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
Thus, for instance, in Zacchini v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:09 pm
As Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in Matel v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
Tam (2017) and Iancu v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:47 pm
Bilski v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:47 pm
Bilski v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 10:01 am
The case, Arizona v. [read post]
