Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2012, 3:45 am
Vincent McGovern resigned from CLANT at a relatively early stage in those discussions.The directors of Esto have advised us that the idea of establishing a new firm for the provision of out-of-hours police station advice came about after Lord Carloway gave a speech at the Law Society’s annual conference on 6 September. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
By Berin Szoka & Adam Thierer We learned from The Wall Street Journal yesterday that “Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski gets a little peeved when people suggests that he wants to regulate the Internet. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Greg Lambert 6:21 Oh, my lord. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm
They’re evil, of course, but it doesn’t make them bad people. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
As President, I must act to protect the security and interests of the United States and its people. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
Golan v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Kevin Thompson is a giant, among hobbits, but that's the subject of another of his creative presentations of Blawg Review -- #144 about the Lord of the Rings. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Kevin Thompson is a giant, among hobbits, but that's the subject of another of his creative presentations of Blawg Review -- #144 about the Lord of the Rings. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 7:31 pm
The recent arbitration decision in Acadia University v Acadia University Faculty Association is instructive in this regard. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
Justice BhatThe Delhi High Court in Shri Rohit Shekhar vs Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari & Anr., has examined the concept of DNA testing and the law pertaining to the same. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
The hearing will feature testimony from Ellen Lord, the undersecretary of defense for acquisition and sustainment; Robert Behler, the director of operational test and evaluation in the office of the secretary of defense; Lt. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:15 pm
The Court of Appeal cite with approval what was said in Strasbourg in YC v United Kingdom (2012) 55 EHRR 967, para 134: ‘Family ties may only be severed in very exceptional circumstances and .. everything must be done to preserve personal relations and, where appropriate, to ‘rebuild’ the family. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
Plaintiffs cannot directly sue people for exercising their democratic right to participate in the political process, though they can frame those activities perceived to be contrary to their interests as torts.[15] Common torts that are used by plaintiffs include: defamation, inducing breach of contract, conspiracy, trespass, nuisance, and interference with contractual relations.[16] Examples of SLAPP lawsuits include framing boycotts as intentional interference with economic relations[17]… [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
The focus of this post, however, is the legislation on the disposal of altars and fonts; in the instant case, the Chancellor stated: “Since the altar will have been dedicated to its sacramental role in the celebration of the Eucharist, or Lord’s Supper, it should not be profaned by any secular use which might result from its sale or disposal for any non-liturgical purpose. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:06 am
See Cairns v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Preamble Since the announcements of the iPhone and Microsoft's Surface (both in 2007), an especially large number of people have asked me about multi-touch. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:07 am
YOUR RIGHTS When people talk about “rights” in the federal criminal justice system, they are usually talking about the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
