Search for: "Russell v. Russell" Results 1781 - 1800 of 3,672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2017, 9:45 am by Barbara Moreno
Forsythe, Clarke D., Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm by Fred Abrams
Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed a July 10, 2012 civil complaint in U.S Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:18 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
The United States Supreme Court has this paradigm case pending before it (Morrison v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:57 pm by Leon Bayer
Barry Russell, Bankruptcy Judge in the Central District of California, and a panel of outstanding bankruptcy professionals. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:57 am by Conor McEvily
The editorial board of The New York Times urges the Court to grant review in Shaygan v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 4:06 am by Timothy P. Flynn
In Sunde v Sunde, mother petitioned the court to change domicile. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 5:41 am
Anyway, the district courts of appeal continue to struggle not so much with the rule but the result under the state supreme court's decision in Lamb v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Daily Caller, Kevin Daley reports that “[t]he Trump administration filed an amicus (or “friend of the court”) brief Wednesday [in American Legion v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
[Federalist Society podcast with Ilya Shapiro, Cato on Supreme Court case of Packingham v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Medical Board's determination is conclusive if it is supported by some credible evidence and is not arbitrary or capricious" (Matter of Russell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 155 AD3d at 1046 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Drummond v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 98 AD3d 1116, 1117). [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Medical Board's determination is conclusive if it is supported by some credible evidence and is not arbitrary or capricious" (Matter of Russell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 155 AD3d at 1046 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Drummond v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 98 AD3d 1116, 1117). [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
Wong and United States v. [read post]