Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 2,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
Pat Basu is a radiologist at Stanford University and the Palo Alto VA. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:44 am
See Lloyd v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
The first was Freeman v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 8:16 am
United States and Shell Oil v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:20 pm
Sci., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
and Stearns (Denis Stearns, On (Cr)edibility: Why Food In the United States May Never Be Safe, 21 Stanford Law & Policy Review 245, 2010.) [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 2:52 pm
Defending the state’s system on Monday, Stanford law professor (and former federal appeals court judge) Michael McConnell told the justices that states have broad leeway in setting qualifications for their officials, including judges. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Across the interbellum era, Americans not only debated the Constitution, laid down vital precedents, and helped fashion the framework of constitutional law; they not only claimed that the Constitution carried certain meanings or led to certain results on federal power, state police power, Cherokee autonomy, or the fate of slavery; in a broader sense, they confronted the problem of constitutional inheritance itself. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 4:30 pm
(Justice Barrett readily cited California v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 2:40 pm
Read more here (from the Stanford Daily). [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
In Merisant Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
Braver and Somin contended that the 1926 Village of Euclid v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:48 pm
Applying these considerations to the case of a duty of care, it’s interesting to note the most recent argument in the FTC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
China: (IPKat),Progress in collecting karaoke royalties: (IP Dragon)EuropeSir Nicholas Pumphrey 1957-2007: (IPKat), (ipeg), (IPFactor), OHIM decision renders Crocs' foam clog Registered European Community Design invalid: (Washington State Patent Law Blog),UK dentist firm beats Lacoste in trade mark dispute: (IPKat), (IP Factor),Patent Trolls statistics, will Europe escape the trolls? [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
Viacom v YouTube: Two weeks ago, as expected (so expected, the AmeriKat adds, that she didn't even think it was news), Viacom filed their appeal in the Viacom v YouTube case in the appeals court in New York (see previous AmeriKat posts on the case here). [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 12:44 am
I.V.Ț. v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:43 am
Handel further argued that Schneider v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 2:00 am
Handel further argued that Schneider v. [read post]
