Search for: "STATE v. LAWRENCE"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 3,374
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2013, 5:20 pm
In Cariou v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 8:49 am
Herrmann, in which the Court is considering whether residents of the Dallas-Fort Worth area have a right to obtain water from across the Oklahoma state line. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:25 am
In Sekhar v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm
McMahonDale Carpenter, FLAGRANT CONDUCT: THE STORY OF LAWRENCE V. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
A CPLR Article 78 challenge to the validity of an employee’s resignation must be filed within four months of the date of the resignation Reo v Village of Lawrence, 2013 NY Slip Op 02403, Appellate Division, Second Department Daniel S. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
Whitton, Lawrence A. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:51 am
The only reason to oppose this bill is as a back-door means of criminalizing youthful gay relations, since after Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am
Lawrence Factory Stores v Ogdensburg Bridge & Port Auth. (202 AD2d 844, 845 [3d Dept 1994]) because the agreement identified the specific purpose of [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:49 pm
This is essentially the core thesis in Lawrence Lessig’s 2003 book, Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity: copyright is a restriction that creates a “permission culture“, as opposed to a free one. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 5:25 pm
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 4:29 am
People v Phillips, 7 Misc 3d 1004 (County Ct, Lawrence County 2005): The defendant did not possess a "billy" when he was found to have a "collapsible baton." [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 3:50 am
Professors Lawrence B. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 4:22 pm
In Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:26 pm
[Citation to Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 2:32 pm
When Justice O’Connor was on the Court, he had her support for the results in both of the seminal gay rights cases on which he wrote the opinion, even though, in Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:02 am
Romer v Evans and Lawrence v Texas), courts tend to conflate the two strands of rights. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
In the article’s opening sentence, Boucai explains: “This Article proposes that same-sex marriage bans channel individuals, particularly bisexuals, into heterosexual relations and relationships, impermissibly burdening the sexual liberty interest protected under Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:06 am
In 1996, we were co-counsel in Romer v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Goldstein v. [read post]
