Search for: "STRANGE v. STATE" Results 1781 - 1800 of 2,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2011, 3:40 am by John Day
The Court reviewed the relatively recent  United States Supreme Court decisions in the area, including  Sereboff v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:00 am by Betsy McKenzie
the ALWD Citation Manual Various states and Canada as well have citations and links in this history. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 6:49 pm by Maria Hook
The Queensland Supreme Court also relied on Ellerman Lines when granting relief in aid of the New Zealand interim orders (Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley (No 2) [2023] QSC 215 at [178]–[188], with the Queensland Court of Appeal upholding the reasoning in Wikeley v Kea Investments Ltd [2024] QSC 201). [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:42 pm by Grayson Clary
If these facts sound familiar to Lawfare readers, it’s likely because of their resemblance to United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
  (Some requirements for expert testimony really are substantive state law, but that is a different issue.) [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 9:30 pm by Howard Wasserman
(Or, at the very least, such a claim would have had to run through catch-all substantive due process and City of Sacramento v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:27 pm by Simon Gibbs
(The strange thing about reports delivered by independent experts is that they almost always manage to say what those commissioning the report wanted. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 9:27 am by Jonathan Bailey
Instead, most seem to follow the route of the Ticketmaster L.L.C. v. [read post]