Search for: "Sayed v. Page"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 12,175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2012, 5:51 am
In Elliot v Google, Inc., CV-12-1072-PHX-MHB, Elliot claims that Google’s once distinctive mark GOOGLE® has become generic and lacks trademark significance due to its common use as a transitive verb. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 1:20 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 11:39 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
(It was too crazy for Judge Jones, and that’s saying a lot). [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Here again are links to the book page and the online supplement.The post Teaching Notes on Students For Fair Admissions v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 9:43 am
And when Judge Bea says (in effect) that federal courts should reserve their limited reservoir of certification orders for things that are particularly important, that strikes a chord with me. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:23 pm
Just 'cause the bankruptcy court says you need to pay $20,000 (or whatever) doesn't mean you actually have to pay it. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 4:51 am
That said, knowing only that Denbury Onshore v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:57 pm
By Eric Goldman Jones v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
And I say that even though I'm somewhat sympathetic with the losing party's position.Elections Code 13305 allows political parties to ask their members for contributions by including a one-page letter in the sample ballot mailed to registered party members, and all they have to pay is the marginal cost of inserting that page. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:55 pm
In nine-page (double-spaced) opinion remarkable for its brevity. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 1:00 pm
"I especially liked footnote 7 of the majority opinion, in which Judge Bea includes a half-page definition of what the colloquial term "terrorist" means. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:35 pm
Particularly when 59 years to life is on the line.I'm not saying the result is wrong. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:03 pm
But check out the last page of the dissent. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Onnen v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:53 am
See Barnes v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 10:19 pm
(Pages 7-8).Randall Walden v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 7:36 am
Case citation: Dehen v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 11:06 am
(Orin Kerr) Linda Greenhouse has a post up about the recent decision in Kentucky v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 10:21 am
Among other justifications, the court says: the Bartholomew court’s reasoning is persuasive. [read post]
