Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant" Results 1781 - 1800 of 5,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2016, 4:01 am by SHG
Search incident to arrest is the exception. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:19 pm by The Swartz Law Firm
The investigation into the debit cards led to a search warrant for the home of a defendant who was connected to TaxProfessor. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:46 pm by Goldstein & Stamm, P.A.
 The Fourth Amendment says: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:46 pm by Goldstein & Stamm, P.A.
 The Fourth Amendment says: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:46 pm by Goldstein & Stamm, P.A.
 The Fourth Amendment says: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 10:27 am by Lefteris K. Travayiakis, Esq.
The sole reason the officer stopped him was investigatory, and the discovery of the warrant was not separate from the search for drugs. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 10:27 am by Lefteris K. Travayiakis, Esq.
The sole reason the officer stopped him was investigatory, and the discovery of the warrant was not separate from the search for drugs. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 4:45 am by Gritsforbreakfast
We've already discussed how the Supreme Court of Texas okayed cops performing illegal searches in pursuit of asset forfeiture seizures. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:53 pm by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC
The court also did not accept the state’s argument that the Hailstorm constituted a valid search for the purpose of triggering the Fourth Amendment’s unreasonable-search-and-seizure protections. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:53 pm by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC
The court also did not accept the state’s argument that the Hailstorm constituted a valid search for the purpose of triggering the Fourth Amendment’s unreasonable-search-and-seizure protections. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 5:45 am by Orin Kerr
The issue being litigated is whether the government could call 911 from the phone without a warrant. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:29 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Leon, the Court held that when police rely on a search warrant, the evidence is admissible even if a later court decides that the issuing magistrate did not actually have the needed probable cause to issue the warrant. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:35 am by The Federalist Society
He moved to dismiss the charge and claimed that the state law in question violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:38 am by Kyle Green
This is true, for the most part, because of the Fourth Amendment, which protects private citizens against unwarranted search and seizure. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 12:32 pm
Carpenter, supra.It went on to explain that the Fourth Amendment protects `[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures[.] [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 4:03 am by SHG
One promising model can be found in Fourth Amendment law on search and seizure. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 4:22 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Arizona drivers currently found guilty of DUI charges are required to install and use an ignition interlock device (IID). [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 4:22 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Arizona drivers currently found guilty of DUI charges are required to install and use an ignition interlock device (IID). [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 8:27 am by Ron Voyles & Associates
The Fourth Amendment provides each of us against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:06 am
Hoffman, supra.The court wnet on to outline the legal issues in the case and the standard it would apply in analyzing those issues:The Fourth Amendment protects the people against unreasonable searches and seizures and provides that warrants shall not be issued absent probable cause. [read post]