Search for: "Slate v State" Results 1781 - 1800 of 2,189
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2010, 12:49 pm by Steve Vladeck
To be sure, readers may disagree with me about Boumediene being rightly decided, or even about Boumediene being decided on a clean slate. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:51 pm by Peter Spiro
  A doctrinal lever is at hand with Sugarman v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:50 am by SHG
  Via Religion Clause : In Byrne v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:45 am by Nabiha Syed
   In Slate, Richard Hasen ponders whether Citizens United allows for foreign spending on American elections. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 10:22 am by Steve Hall
As noted above, the responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 7:52 am by Gritsforbreakfast
And here's an excellent soup to nuts account of the case from Slate written before oral arguments were held. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am by Adam Chandler
United States, a sentencing case that was argued on Monday. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:38 am by Nabiha Syed
Mike Dorf recaps an ABA webinar on last Term’s animal cruelty “crush video” case, United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 6:23 pm by David Bernstein
I think that judicial review is implicit in the Constitution, for the reasons stated by Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Concepcion (Federal Arbitration Act preemption of California rule that a waiver of class arbitration in a consumer contract may be unenforceable) Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Only under state law, a meeting with a group of shareholders that exceeds 5% may well trigger a poison pill, at least where the group comes to agreement on a common slate of nominees. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 7:03 am by Anna Christensen
At Law.com, Tony Mauro and Carrie Levine report that the video game industry has been soliciting the support of state attorneys general in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 5:00 am by Tad Lunger
Fairfax County, et al. has been slated for the Supreme Court's September arguments docket. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:25 am by Anna Christensen
Chicago and Cooper Industries v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:14 pm by Eric Talley
For example, Delaware’s Chancery Court has recently approved the maintenance of a dilutive shareholder rights plan triggered at an ownership threshold of 4.99% (see Selecteca v. [read post]