Search for: "State v. Connor" Results 1781 - 1800 of 2,536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Ofcom stated that the financial penalty was issued due to the “seriousness and repeated nature of this breach,” and will require the broadcaster to publish a statement of its findings on a date determined by the regulator. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:30 am by Conor McEvily
At Talking Points Memo, Sahil Kapur discusses retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s recently expressed doubts on whether the Court should have granted review in Bush v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:12 am by Peter Huang
As As Levine, Safer, and Lench nicely state it, "[i]n the same way, updating a map when new roads are built makes it more accurate. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
In a case on the plenary docket, Ramirez v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:33 am by Kari Hong
He asked, why doesn’t Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s observation in Landon v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 10:33 am by Amy Howe
Four justices – Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Clarence Thomas – agreed in Vieth v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 10:51 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Ginsburg’s notable Supreme Court opinions include her majority opinion in the United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 6:44 am by James Bickford
  David Savage reports for the Los Angeles Times on Cullen v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by Allison Trzop
  Anticipating what a victory for same-sex advocates could mean in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Timothy Bonis
Michael Young cites the Court’s 1995 ruling in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:04 am by Todd Henderson
Kennedy demurred, noting that Texas and other states could be laboratories of experimentation during the last half of the O’Connor window. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
In an interview with the editorial board of The Chicago Tribune, retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor expressed doubts about whether the Court should have granted review in Bush v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:40 am
Merritt, The Future of Religious Pluralism: Justice O'Connor and the Establishment Clause, 39 Arizona State Law Journal 895-948 (2007). [read post]