Search for: "State v. David." Results 1781 - 1800 of 14,227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2021, 4:59 pm by Amy Howe
” Wilson contends that the censure is unconstitutional under the court’s 1966 ruling in Bond v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers, Journalism and Regulation David Erdos, writing for Inforrm in two parts, takes a first look at the Information Commissioner’s Office Draft Data Protection and Journalism Code. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
EST, the Society will host Making Minimum Wage: Elsie Parrish v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 6:45 am by Charles Kotuby
As noted in an earlier post on this site, the United States Supreme Court granted a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Cassirer v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 6:20 am
You might remember that the first legal challenge to California’s board gender diversity statute, Crest v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
In a report issued by the Tax Policy Center, David C. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
The announcement follows the tragic murder of MP Sir David Amess on 15 October 2021. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 3:19 pm by Amy Howe
However, Acting Solicitor General Brian Fletcher added, any testimony by Zayn Husayn, also known as Abu Zubaydah, would be subject to a national-security review, and it would not resolve the dispute over whether testimony by two CIA contractors who supervised the CIA’s torture program is protected by the “state secrets” privilege – the question at the center of United States v. [read post]