Search for: "State v. Davis"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 6,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2017, 2:27 pm
Davis v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
However, according to Davis v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:35 am
Bank National Association v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:20 pm
Payne (La. 2002); see also Davis v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:10 am
And in Davis v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
Sellers, which asks when a federal court in a habeas case should “look through” a summary state-court ruling to review the last reasoned state-court decision. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:17 pm
Something odd happened during Monday’s 59-minute oral argument in Ayestas v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 11:15 am
People, organizations, governments at all levels —federal, state and municipal— go through a process that can be anticipated and in doing so, facilitates the recovery and rebuilding efforts. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:41 am
The first is Ayestas v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
Amr al-Azm, associate professor at Shawnee State University, drew attention to the importance of Syrian cultural heritage and the importance of non-state actors to preserve it. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:09 am
After unsuccessfully appealing his conviction and pursuing state collateral review, Ayestas filed a federal habeas petition in 2009, raising a series of claims – including that, under Wiggins v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 12:56 pm
” Unlike the Davis trial, Texas v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:12 am
Hudson, State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:42 am
Am. v ABB Power Generation, 91 NY2d 180, 186 [1997]; see 2138747 Ontario, Inc. v Samsung C & T Corp., 144 AD3d 122 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 2:56 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 2:56 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
In fact, the 14th Amendment had been passed during the time of Davis’ indictment in the federal court system, when the case of United States v. [read post]
