Search for: "State v. High"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 31,458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
The High Court ruled, in Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), that under European Union Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II), Spanish law applied in the case of a UK resident seeking compensation for serious injuries sustained in Spain, at the hands of an uninsured driver, then resident in Spain.The claimant issued proceedings against the defendant, the Motor Insurers' Bureau, in its capacity as a compensatory body under the Motor Vehicles… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
The High Court ruled, in Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), that under European Union Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II), Spanish law applied in the case of a UK resident seeking compensation for serious injuries sustained in Spain, at the hands of an uninsured driver, then resident in Spain.The claimant issued proceedings against the defendant, the Motor Insurers' Bureau, in its capacity as a compensatory body under the Motor Vehicles… [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 5:18 pm
Laney] proposes the three V model. [read post]
20 May 2011, 8:53 am
The Lincoln Journal, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:42 am
The Deputy High Court Judge dismissed both of the respondent’s grounds. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:34 am
As a consequence, Goldberg's state law claims for breach of contract and fiduciary duty were preempted by the SLUSA and must be brought in federal court (Goldberg v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:01 pm
In New Energy Company Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:08 am
The full text of the judgment in the case of Rajesh Solanki v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
In terms of recent cases, there's been the Maryland high court decision in Gourdine v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 11:23 pm
Meanwhile, the country awaits a decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 8:36 am
MARBURY V. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
Supreme Court The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34 (18 July 2012) Munir & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 32 (18 July 2012) Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33 (18 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Horn & Ors v Commercial Acceptances Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 958 (19 July 2012)… [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 11:57 am
In Boldt v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 7:39 am
Nmako v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:11 am
Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas affirmed that decision last month. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Miller v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:30 am
Mireles v. [read post]
23 Nov 2024, 10:01 pm
’” In Jones v. [read post]
