Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 173,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2010, 8:29 pm
Lund (Wayne State) has posted Salazar v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 1:04 pm
This week the North Carolina Court of Appeals held in State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
Facts of Granholm v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 10:43 am
On April 10, in People of California v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am
[1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:24 am
State of New York (1st Dept., decided 4/29/2010) In Lang v Hanover Ins. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
Attorney)Source of Law: United StatesVerdict or Settlement Amount: N/ALegal Claims: Computer Fraud and Abuse ActFraudTheftOtherCourt Name: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas: Dallas DivisionLegal Counsel: Douglas A Morris (Federal Public Defender - Dallas); Ahmed Ghappour (University of Texas Law School), Charles D. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 9:38 am
The post On the right to testify in Graves v US first appeared on Koehler Law. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 11:49 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Tanner Allread, Stanford University, has posted The Specter of Indian Removal: The Persistence of State Supremacy Arguments in Federal Indian Law, which appears in the Columbia Law Review:In the 2022 case of Oklahoma v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:08 am
The Harris v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:34 am
United States [Cornell LII Backgrounder; oral arguments transcript; JURIST report] that a private individual can challenge whether a federal criminal law passed to implement an international treaty is valid under the Tenth Amendment [text]. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:55 pm
In its second opinion of the term, CAAF today reversed the Army CCA in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:09 am
VAT relief only if goods physically move out of member state Regina (Teleos plc and Others) v Commissioners of Customs and Excise “A supply of goods qualified as an intra-Community supply of goods that in principle was exempt from value-added tax only if the goods physically moved from the EC member state of dispatch to the destination state. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:33 pm
It argued that a decision from 1945, International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 5:32 am
CAAF heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 12:06 am
United States, the Sixth Circuit's new decision that largely rewrites the law of e-mail privacy. [read post]
