Search for: "State v. Lee"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 4,534
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2009, 4:53 am
Under Articles 29.03 and 29.08 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, a motion for a continuance must be WRITTEN and SWORN to by a person having personal knowledge of the facts relied on for the continuance.David Lee Anderson II, Anderson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:04 am
” At Ars Technica (via How Appealing), Timothy Lee looks at Georgia v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:38 am
The state Supreme Court found that Hall had an IQ of 71. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:58 pm
Lee (preference in employment)* U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 12:29 pm
Lans v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 12:08 pm
In People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
State Fish Co., Inc. (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 671, 690; Shadow Traffic Network v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am
” The Supreme Court Building is the seat of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Judicial Branch thereof. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:03 am
The Facts Of United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:58 pm
It’s small, in light of his other issues, but Donald Trump is once again embroiled in litigation, albeit outside of the United States, which may result in findings against him of at least negligent misrepresentation sufficient to produce personal liability: see Singh v Trump et al, 2016 ONCA 747 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gv3z7>. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:45 pm
Lee, No. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:46 pm
Lee, Case No. 14150. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:37 am
Comm’n v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am
-area sniper Lee Boyd Malvo is asking the justices to overturn his sentence of life without parole, and Peter v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 8:48 am
Its most recent burial, only last Term, was, to be sure, not fully six-feet under: our decision in Lee v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
Similarly, under the establishment clause, the Supreme Court in Lee v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am
” At Legal Aggregate, Gregory Ablavsky weighs in on last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:56 am
However, the record does not demonstrate that the court was so vexed that it could not be impartial (22 NYCRR 100.3[E][1]; see Liteky v United States, 510 US 540, 555-556 [1994]; Hass & Gottlieb v Sook Hi Lee, 55 AD3d 433, 434 [1st Dept 2008]; People v A.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 8:10 pm
In People v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:17 am
Justice Lee’s decision followed a decision of the Full Federal Court in Joukhador v Ten Network Pty Ltd in 2021. [read post]
