Search for: "State v. Scales" Results 1781 - 1800 of 4,700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2007, 5:36 am
While these criminal defendants might well have been prosecuted successfully simply for untrue statements, see generally United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm by Daphne Keller
Consent to jurisdiction, which is a required element of a counter-notice under section 512(g)(3)(D), is a meaningful legal concession, and is particularly problematic for users who do not reside in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 7:36 am by Sandy Levinson
” In those states, one must hope that state courts enforcing their own constitutions—the United States constitution is one of only 51 in the entire United States, and the other 50 constitutions all differ from the United States Constitution in important ways—to preclude partisan gerrymandering. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 1:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
Roper, the Court should not have acted until after full-scale review. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm by Dennis Crouch
S. 633 (2010) (quoting, for its current relevance, statement in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
The first is McGirt v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 3:43 am by INFORRM
But Mr Johnson said his colleague had “made an assumption” and that he had not stated his information came from police. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:40 am by Frank Cross
  Then I compiled the citations to the opinions on different scales. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
 At the close of the nine day bench trial, Judge Guilford stated that he had concluded there were "dramatic acts of misappropriation" and his opinion emphasized that his findings of fact were "largely based" on the credibility of the witnesses. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:03 am by Maya Angenot
The Burkean persona emphasizes the limits of large-scale theories. [read post]