Search for: "State v. Sullivan" Results 1781 - 1800 of 2,731
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2024, 12:43 pm by binder'sblog
” The Supreme Court held in the 1966 case of Sheppard v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
While both Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Neil Gorsuch have criticized Sullivan and called for it to be overruled, it seems unlikely that the court will grant review; just last term, the court relied on Sullivan in holding that threats could not be prosecuted under the First Amendment absent proof they were made in reckless disregard that the listener would be placed in fear. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  They sue their personal injury law firm in Marinelli v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 2:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan (1964) (requiring a heightened "actual malice" standard before imposing liability for defaming a public official); Gertz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:17 am by Susan Brenner
Green, __ N.Y.S.2d __, 2011 WL 2320239 (New York County Court – Sullivan County 2011). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Lawyers representing Shazam, the company set up by the original show’s creator John Sullivan prior to his death in 2011, accuse the theatre production company of tricking customers into thinking it was an officially endorsed product. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:36 am
 These three are the core authors of what is referred to as LLSV which at times has also included Robert Vishny (the "V" of LLSV), Simon Djankov, Christian Pop-Eleches, Ed Glaesser, and Daniel Wolfenzon. [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:16 am by Daphne Keller
Sullivan, book publishers sued a state-appointed commission that sought to prevent harms from obscene literature, because of pressure the commission had put on commercial distributors to restrict certain books. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:31 am by Conor McEvily
” Writing for the online journal Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein critiques the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]