Search for: "State v. Twist"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 2,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
The judgment provides an interesting analysis of the twists and turns of the Clifford/Burrell relationship and is worth reading in full. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:03 am
Here’s a twist on another adage: If you don’t succeed at first, don’t try again if doing so squarely conflicts with prior court order. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 1:43 pm
Specifically, you head over to United States Tax Court. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
id=62ac2fc048370f4c2c31b714 ALLEGEDLY INFRINGING URLS: https://conlinpa.com/2016/04/03/hyman-v-daoud/ As you might gather, you can't stop people from writing about you by registering your name as a trademark. [* * *] Here's that post from last week: I wrote about Hyman v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
In a further twist in the Coldwater case, the Federal Court of Appeal, relying on Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, deferred to Cabinet’s own assessment of whether it had fulfilled its duty to consult and accommodate. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
Rank v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:17 am
In Riegel v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 2:07 pm
” (FDA’s determination of its jurisdiction to issue the ban was challenged and upheld in State of La. v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:07 am
Relying principally on Sternberg v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:52 am
UK (1984) 7 EHRR 14), P.G. and J.H. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 8:15 pm
In an interesting but ultimately moronic twist, Wyers tr [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:22 am
Vachaci and US v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am
The March 6 decision by Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California in California v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
" Stalley v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am
So there’s no doubt that this judge is twisting the law to accommodate the victim’s horrifying circumstances. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:29 am
In October, in Watermeir v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 11:31 am
By Amy Clarise AshworthState v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 5:57 am
’” The ironic twist here seems to be that, if section 101 imposes a statutory requirement of proper form, then the prevailing situation would seem quite the opposite of the Court’s stated view. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
