Search for: "State v. Whited"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 13,709
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2022, 3:17 pm
Code §192 - Refusal of witness to testify or produce papersUnited States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Andy Biggs and state Rep.Mark Finchem. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:13 am
Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Howell Williams, Western Connecticut State University, “Workers Built Danbury: Deindustrialized Memory in a Hatting Town”Josh Kluever, Binghamton University (SUNY), “Sorry Waldman, We Just Couldn’t Help It: Socialist State Legislators in New York, 1912-1922”CARCERAL STATE, CARCERAL SOCIETYModerator: Elizabeth Hinton, Yale University Panelists: Max Felker-Kantor, Ball State University, “Arresting the Demand for Drugs: DARE… [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 3:36 pm
From the decision Thursday by Judge Katherine Polk Failla (S.D.N.Y.) in Maron v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 11:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:59 am
" In Gahl v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 5:16 am
The White paper presented policy options for a future EU regulatory framework for AI and announced the update of the Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Such calls are not limited to the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
White supremacists probably expected Plessy v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 10:02 am
After eight years of regulatory roadblocks, Continental sued the CAB (Continental Airlines v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:48 am
In Wilkins v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 7:29 am
Under the United States Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:06 am
” He warned “non-whites on white lands” to leave, because “as long as the White man lives you will never be safe here. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:58 am
“We’re not going to send to Ukraine rocket systems that strike into Russia,” Biden told reporters after arriving back at the White House after a weekend in Delaware. [read post]
29 May 2022, 8:42 am
Hartigan v. [read post]
