Search for: "Strain v. State" Results 1781 - 1800 of 1,920
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
It marked the United States’ largest military campaign to date, involving 1.2 million soldiers of the American Expeditionary Force. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
  Increased competition and technological/platform proliferation are placing an enormous strain on traditional media operations and business models. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Fictional memory, imaginary state of mind, imagined shopping experience—and then we complain that we don’t have ecologically valid evidence! [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As described below, state, federal and international breach notification laws arguably do not apply to ransomware attacks because no corporate data is actually pilfered. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:44 am by Ron Coleman
 Well, first, the standard — enunciated for the first time in DC Comics v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm by Ron Coleman
 Well, first, the standard — enunciated for the first time in DC Comics v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 2:16 pm by David Walk
The whistleblowers complained that it ain’t easy being a whistleblower: relationships are strained; retaliation happens. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:12 pm
State of Kerala & Anr. 2000(6) SCC 359 and State of Bombay Vs. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:15 pm by Josh Blackman
 To the extent the Judicial Conference guidance purports to address this problem it only states that the JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet should state "the remedy sought has implication beyond the parties before the court or that the case seeks to bar or mandate statewide or nationwide enforcement of a state of federal law. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Tasting the TM in Pepsi/Coke studies.What we know about brands v. what we know about TMs—Deven Desai has written about the distinction and the lack thereof that has been part of the problem. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 11:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
”   Specifically, the complaint alleges that the defendants misrepresented or failed to disclose that “(i) Zoom had inadequate data privacy and security measures; (ii) contrary to Zoom’s assertions, the Company’s video communications services was not end-to-end- encrypted; (iii) as a result of all the foregoing, users of Zoom’s communications services were at increased risk of having their personal information access by unauthorized parties, including Facebook;… [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 8:31 am
The strain brought on by being placed in stress positions caused Mr. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 12:30 am
i4i files Supreme Court argument, US Government agrees The i4i v Microsoft battle is definitely an old IP story dating back to 2007, but only three weeks ago i4i filed their reply to Microsoft's appeal in the U.S. [read post]