Search for: "TAYLOR v. STATE"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 3,088
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
See Savage v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 9:33 am
Taylor precedent. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 3:10 am
Allegations Allegations of overbilling, padding of costs, and billing for unnecessary legal services can constitute a cause of action for breach of contract, provided the allegations do not directly challenge the quality of the attorney’s work (Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415,416 [1st Dept 2014]; O’Connor v Blodnick, Abramowitz and Blodnick, 295 AD2d 586,587 [2d Dept 2002] [same]). [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:50 am
There are other State statutes* vesting powers in public employers similar to those set out in §155 of the Town Law. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 7:32 am
The International Court of Justice's Decision in Bosnia v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 5:20 pm
Compare United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 4:50 pm
Earlier this week, Stuart Taylor Jr. had this piece in the National Journal on the Ledbetter ruling, stating that "the suggestions by Ginsburg and the media that the decision leaves women such as Ledbetter with no adequate remedy for pay discrimination ... are vastly exaggerated. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
Four years ago, our law firm won a joint landmark double jeopardy victory with now-chief Public Defender Nancy Forster in State of Maryland v. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
Four years ago, our law firm won a joint landmark double jeopardy victory with now-chief Public Defender Nancy Forster in State of Maryland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:50 am
As stated in Taylor v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 1:52 pm
The opinion is Middleton, et al v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am
At Newsweek, Stuart Taylor Jr. discusses Kagan’s praise for Israeli Supreme Court Justice Aharon Barak, whose support for liberal causes, Taylor argues, “makes Marshall look almost like a champion of judicial restraint. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 8:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
Taylor, 2019 Cal. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Taylor also summarized U.S. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Taylor also summarized U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
But we have travelled some distance since Fry J's restrictive probanda were uttered (Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Ltd [1982] 1 QB 133, of course, being the most pertinent authority, but others are cited), and Patten LJ said that the court was able "to take a flexible and very fact-specific approach to each case in which estoppel by acquiescence is relied upon" (at [39]). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
But we have travelled some distance since Fry J's restrictive probanda were uttered (Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Ltd [1982] 1 QB 133, of course, being the most pertinent authority, but others are cited), and Patten LJ said that the court was able "to take a flexible and very fact-specific approach to each case in which estoppel by acquiescence is relied upon" (at [39]). [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 4:38 pm
In one recent case, Bollea v. [read post]
