Search for: "Texas v. United States"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 8,319
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2021, 4:16 am
., LLC, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:52 pm
But the Fifth Circuit’s hyper-deferential rational basis review is inconsistent with the Court’s decision in Carhart, and eliminates the crucial distinction between the state’s interests in protecting potential life and its interest in women’s health, thereby permitting Texas to violate the limitations Casey imposes on the means by which the state may protect unborn life.In the Supreme Court’s opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:08 am
State, 2015 WL 575334 (Court of Appeals of Texas 2015). [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:05 pm
In 1990, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Michigan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:05 pm
In 1990, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Michigan v. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 6:32 am
Section 1441(a) permits the removal of “any civil action brought in a state court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 6:00 am
This matter, styled United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 11:50 am
Textron, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Western District of Texas – November 17th, 2015 – This is a personal injury/products liability case involving a Workhorse cart. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has held that a Texas attorney may not engage in class arbitration against the parent company of the legal research system LexisNexis. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 5:46 pm
., and Bryant Hickman (“Hickman”)(collectively “NanoVapor”) in the United States DistrictCourt for the Southern District of Texas, seeking to haveNathan and Matheson recognized as joint inventors under35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 2:16 am
The case involves the attempt by President Bush to have Texas state courts abide by a ruling of the World Court that the United States, and some of its states, have violated the Vienna Convention on the right of foreign nationals arrested and prosecuted for crime in the U.S. to meet with a diplomat from their home country. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
Although the United States Supreme Court at one time interpreted the clause to bar admission of out-of-court statements that lacked adequate indicia of reliability (Ohio v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm
In Addington v Texas, the United States Supreme Court held that a civil commitment proceeding can in no sense be equated with a criminal proceeding. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Throughout the controversy, debaters referenced the United States Supreme Court Case of Plyler v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Senen Pousa and Investment Intelligence Corporation PTY LLC Case number: 12-cv-00863 (United States District Court for the Western District of Texas) Case filed: September 18, 2012 Qualifying judgment/order: December 4, 2013 12/20/2013 03/20/2014 2013-118 SEC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:21 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:30 am
Gensetix argued that immunity should be limited to its text and applied only to cases “against one of the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm
United States, 536 U.S. 545 and applying Apprendi v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
