Search for: "U. S. Federal Government" Results 1781 - 1800 of 5,043
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
With all the talk of division among the justices, the Court’s decision was unanimous (8-0) that state and local governments, regardless of size, can be sued for age discrimination. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 7:12 am by Megan Carpenter
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed that substantial evidence supported the board’s findings that the FUCT mark is vulgar and was therefore unregistrable under Section 2(a). [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:29 am by Jeremy Gordon
The Issue The principal question before the court was whether Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)—which prohibits disclosure of any “matter occurring before the grand jury” by attorneys for the government—presents an exhaustive list of exceptions to the rule of grand jury secrecy, or whether a district court has the inherent authority to disclose grand jury materials in situations outside those exceptions. [read post]
Regardless of how it ultimately rules, the Supreme Court’s decision in FMI is likely to affect the Governments application of FOIA Exemption 4 for years to come. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 8:08 am by Cannabis Law Group
It’s not as if the federal government doesn’t know these facilities are in operation. [read post]
Regardless of how it ultimately rules, the Supreme Court’s decision in FMI is likely to affect the Governments application of FOIA Exemption 4 for years to come. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
Federal law probits the interstate transportation of raw milk for human consumption. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:47 pm by John Floyd
Flores-Ortega applied in his case, making it clear to all the lower federal and state courts that this is the “law of the land”:   “Contrary to the argument by Idaho and the U. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court, which ruled the federal government couldn’t stop him from using his hovercraft to reach hunting grounds he had visited for decades. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Waite went on to author what is generally characterized as one of the Supreme Court’s worst rulings, one that handicapped the federal governments ability to protect newly freed slaves for nearly a century. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:29 am by Neil Siegel
The report declared that the plan was “contrary to the spirit of the Constitution” and that “[u]nder the form of the Constitution it seeks to do that which is unconstitutional. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 11:15 am by IPWatchdog
After briefly describing the interrelationship between patent law and antitrust law, I will highlight the role of the Federal Trade Commission’s policy interest in the structure of the law bearing on patentability. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Indiana argued that the 8th Amendment ban on "excessive fines" applied only to the federal government; not to the states. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:47 pm by David M. Boertje
Constitution bars excessive fines and limits the ability of the federal government to seize property. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:00 pm by Shea Denning
Having determined that Shackelford’s speech was protected by the state and federal constitution, the court considered whether the content-based restrictions in G.S. 15A-277.3A were narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 2:00 am by Kristin Starnes Gray, FordHarrison
The Federation also pointed out that the men’s and women’s teams have separately negotiated collective bargaining agreements governing pay and other issues. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:31 am by Kellie McTammany
The Democrats contend that while the Republican tax law eliminates the federal penalty for being uninsured, it does not negate the entire ACA’s constitutionality. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 1:16 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
The Dream and Promise Act would cancel the removal (also known as “deportation”) of and grant conditional permanent resident (CPR) status to a person who is inadmissible or deportable from the U.S. if the person: has been continuously physically present in the U.S. for at least four years before the date of the bill’s enactment; entered the U.S. before turning 18; (a) has been admitted to a college, university or other higher educational institution; or (b) has earned… [read post]