Search for: "U. S. v. Court" Results 1781 - 1800 of 10,795
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2021, 3:39 pm by Bevin Newman and Thomas Dillickrath
At the Supreme Court, the NCAA cited the Courts previous decision in the 1984 case NCAA v. [read post]
Supreme Court Decision, June 29, 2021, https://penneastpipeline.com/penneast-pipeline-statement-on-favorable-u-s-supreme-court-decision/. [3] Id. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 8:46 am by Patricia Salkin
The Court also distinguished the taking claims rejected in PruneYard Shopping Center v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 9:09 am by Patricia Salkin
S. ____ (2021) was a per curiam decision that explored the ramifications of the Courts landmark ruling in Knick v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:58 am by Tian Lu
 The Beijing High People’s Court upheld Beijing IP Courts ruling. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Yet, in  Scarola Malone & Zubatov LLP v Ellner     2021 NY Slip Op 31199(U), April 8, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651324/2017 Judge: Anthony Cannataro that is what happens. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:46 am by Eric Goldman
The plaintiff is represented by Browne George Ross, the same law firm that brought the unsuccessful Prager U v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 12:12 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit concluded, on the merits, that that Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Eviction Moratorium is unlawful in Tiger Lily, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
Michigan’s Attorney General has already announced the state’s intention to apply for leave with the Michigan Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 11:06 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
After reviewing the facts and holding in Ramirez, we discuss how the decision clarifies the concrete harm requirement established by SCOTUS’s Spokeo decision, Ramirez’s implications for class action and individual lawsuits alleging violations of federal consumer financial protection laws, and the potential impact on state court litigation. [read post]