Search for: "United States v. Craft"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 1,899
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2008, 6:20 pm
In 1973, Earl and Iona Monroe, owners of a plot of land along the Middle Fork of the Clearwater River in Idaho, including a twoacre tract, granted the United States a scenic easement under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, 16 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 7:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:53 pm
Ogman, No. 06-0203 "A sentence for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute and possession with intent to distribute cocaine base is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in considering both convictions in sentencing defendant; and 2) the decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 4:15 am
Early in 1941, Ribbentrop and I promised the Japanese foreign minister, Yosuke Matsuoka, that should Japan become engaged in a war against the United States, Germany would join the war immediately. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
About 446 unit employees have Chinese surnames and were born in mainland China, Hong Kong, or Taiwan. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:50 am
United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)================================================Indiana convicted sex offender computer search law unconstitutional under Fourth Amendment (excellent discussion)================================================Reasonable expectation of privacy exists in e-mail:STEVEN WARSHAK, Plaintiff-Appellee, -v- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,The district court correctly determined that e-mail users maintain a reasonable expectation of… [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:18 am
That inconvenience, however, is one of the fundamental protections that separates the United States of America from totalitarian regimes. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:59 pm
United States, 503 F.3d 1234. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 3:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:31 pm
Writing for the Court, Justice Thomas explained that the holding of United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
28 May 2008, 9:52 pm
There is a curious irony to Judge Weinstein's decision in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 9:13 am
On May 19, 2008 the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 6:28 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
While she may have had four supervised years of medical school to master her craft, when is she considered generally knowledgeable based on her training? [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 2:29 pm
C.A.A.F. has issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:32 am
This principle was established by the United States in one of the most dramatic of the post-World War II proceedings, United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
