Search for: "United States v. Breyer"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 3,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
” (Slip op. at 1 Breyer, J., dissenting). [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 9:42 am
The judgement of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
RP: You might ask Justice Breyer this question. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 3:50 pm
The Supreme Court therefore affirmed the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
The panel stated that lower courts should not assume that the presumption against extraterritoriality enunciated in Kiobel “categorically bars cases that manifest a close connection to United States territory. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
United States, language commanding the states to act can be interpreted in one of two ways. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am
United States, in which a commercial fisherman was prosecuted under the federal Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized fish, and the amicus brief that Cato filed in the case. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 4:57 pm
” United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
Five Justices in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:57 pm
”); United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:24 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:11 am
Supreme Court Rules Against Aereo Place-and-Time-Shifting Technology Case Note by Gordon Firemark On June 25, the United States Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated ruling in American Broadcasting Co v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:08 am
Like the legal profession generally, the United States Supreme Court has a reputation as slow to embrace new technologies. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 11:02 pm
Anthony Kennedy described him in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 11:11 am
Is Justice Breyer quoting Missouri v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
Justice Kagan wrote a dissent, in which Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor joined. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, said, “The justices have set a dangerous precedent. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:18 am
However, the decision applies only to a category of ostensibly public workers who aren’t “full-fledged” state employees, and to which the High Court’s 1977 holding in Abood v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 10:25 am
Harris v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
Last week, a unanimous Supreme Court of the United States agreed that the appointments at issue were invalid. [read post]
