Search for: "United States v. California" Results 1781 - 1800 of 13,833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm by Cicely Wilson
Perry, United States Supreme Court (6/26/13)United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:41 am
A lengthy explanation of reasonable suspicion and suspected forged paper tags is United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm by Sandy Levinson
How, if he becomes president, might the civil war begin, since there will certainly be no Fort Sumter to signal the beginning, and the California vote for secession apparently won't take place until 2019. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:38 pm by Mike
District Court for the Northern District of California have recently released decisions on labor cases among them: Carr v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 8:22 am by Doug Cornelius
Black should have looked at the formula used by the United States Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
(“WildTangent”), in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:33 pm by The Complex Litigator
United States District Court Judge Susan Illston (Northern District of California) denied certification in a suit by security guards alleging, among other things, failure to provide adequate rest breaks and failure to provide adequate wage statements. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:52 pm by NARF
(Compel Agency Action; Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act) United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 9:21 am
Then his case was then taken all the way to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Pasadena. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:11 am by Docket Navigator
[T]his District is ranked 17th in the United States for weighted filings per judge (based on four judges as of March 31, 2017) while the Northern District of California is ranked 23rd based on fourteen judges as of March 31, 2017. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm by Rebecca Blaw
  Such a head-scratching, impractical rule cannot be reconciled with the United States Supreme Court’s class action decisions in cases such as Wal-Mart v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 5:10 am
United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972), because the banks were under a “duty not to engage in a fraudulent scheme,” and by participating in the transactions with Enron, they had violated that duty. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:24 am by David DePaolo
In June the California Supreme Court ruled that Sierra Chemical Co.'s argument that Vicente Salas was not legally eligible to hold a job in the United States was not a complete defense to the worker's claims under the state's Fair Employment and Housing Act.The company has now asked the United States Supreme Court to review that decision, arguing that Federal immigration law and policy override California's FEHA… [read post]