Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 6,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2008, 9:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 2:59 am
Decision tells the story of how the choice to lodge the Great Seal (imprint above left) (credit) at headquarters of the Secretary of State set the stage for events that culminated in the Supreme Court's landmark opinion on judicial review, Marbury v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:29 am
” [9] The Court also noted that the English courts (in subsequent cases such as Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust and Chester v Afshar) had quietly ceased to follow Sidaway‘s adoption of the Bolam test. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 3:32 pm
The United States has filed an amicus brief taking a middle position. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:13 pm
Williams noted that the United States Supreme Court in Missouri v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:35 am
United States, 943 F.Supp. 159, 168 (D.R.I.1996) (articulating the circuit split); see also Ugo Colella & Adam Bain, The Burden of Proving Jurisdiction Under the Federal Torts Claim Act: A Uniform Approach to Allocation, 67 Fordham L.Rev. 2859 (1999). [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm
The Federalist was the first self-conscious handbook on the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 5:54 pm
… by the United States House of Representatives Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol …. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:37 pm
The Government’s argument: No one seemed all that happy with the United States’ official immunit [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 11:12 am
The new appeal, in a legal form that the Court has little choice but to decide it, is an attempt to expand the impact of the Justices’ ruling in January, in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 6:16 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
’ Martin v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:17 am
Mazda Motor of America Inc.: By providing a choice in safety features, federal regulations do not automatically preempt state tort claims against manufacturers.Honorable Mentions: Thompson v. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 8:51 am
The question is whether a federal court hearing a state law claim under the Act must apply the forum state’s choice-of-law rules or whether it may apply federal common law. [read post]
8 May 2016, 7:01 am
As pointed out in the above extract, even in United States the doctrine is currently of doubtful legitimacy. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 3:45 pm
Even the United States Supreme Court, I've discovered, has called it the "California District Court of Appeals," and has done so a half-dozen times. [read post]
25 Apr 2025, 10:39 am
The court granted review in United States Postal Service v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:34 am
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Arterton, J.) granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all counts. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:08 pm
But in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
