Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 1781 - 1800 of 16,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 pm
  The Ninth Circuit doesn't find it in the briefs, saying:  "Macy’s argues that United failed to establish the chain of title to the underlying artwork and therefore does not have a valid copyright. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:54 pm by Matt Osenga
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976); Keystone Driller Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:24 am by Gregory Forman
Other than our state attorney general, Alan Wilson, few attorneys believe Judge Childs won’t be compelled by Bostic v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:04 pm
  As to that, only the concurring judge would have allowed general jurisdiction by consent – on the theory that a century-old United States Supreme Court case (that the Second Circuit concluded had been abrogated by the last fifty years of jurisdictional precedent, 2016 WL 641392, at *16-17) still controlled. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:24 pm
Thus, this court remands to the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona to determine the reassignment of this case. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Circuit cases involving these issues in which Kavanaugh was one of the judges deciding the case. [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:00 am
Goodwin for the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia denied defendant’s motion to dismiss medical monitoring claims related to ethylene oxide (“EtO”) emissions in Letart v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Martoma, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit overruled its own 2014 decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:49 pm by David Markus
  The 11th Circuit took a dive into this interesting issue in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 5:15 am by Rebecca Tapscott
Acer, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), in a decision authored by Judge Dyk, held that the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the district court) erred in refusing to remand a case where removal was improper under 28 U.S.C. [read post]