Search for: "United States v. Felt"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 2,646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2012, 2:04 pm
State (Ala. 2001) and Rejent v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:38 pm
The Supreme Court of Florida has decided the case of Joelis Jardines, Petitioner, v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:02 am
In it, Alan juxtaposes some still-smouldering embers of last month's British case law with a cookie that may soon be in the oven in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 4:48 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:02 am
A few weeks later I reported to active duty in the United States Air Force at Norton AFB, San Bernardino, CA. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 10:07 am
The rule of lenity is a propsition in United States law that states when statutes are contradictory or unclear any ambiguity should be resolved in favor of a defendant. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 10:07 am
The rule of lenity is a propsition in United States law that states when statutes are contradictory or unclear any ambiguity should be resolved in favor of a defendant. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 6:31 am
With the passage of time the number of sick industrial units increased rapidly. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
That stance is at odds with the US Supreme Court decision in United States v Jones (January 23, 2012), about which I posted yesterday. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:38 am
On Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court issued three decisions. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:06 am
In the Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:39 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
The Court rejected the allegations showing that “pivotal aspects of the purchases” were made in the United States”. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
It’s because he or she thinks they can get away with it.“ The BBC has responded to an article in the Daily Mail which claimed that the BBC spent £4m laying off staff, but half the employees continued working as normal. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 8:16 am
United States, which was entered in June, 2011, is more informative. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 3:05 pm
A member of that majority perhaps felt that a state should at least get a full chance to defend one of its laws before it was struck down. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:05 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
For example, when the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
Then the Supreme Court rendered its decision in Morrison v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:30 pm
Ever since the notion of an operational duty was first enunciated in Osman v United Kingdom (2000) 29 EHRR 245, it has become something of a judicial mantra that the threshold for establishing a “real and immediate” threat was high (see for example Re Officer L [2007] UKHL 36, and Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2009] AC 681 [41] and [66],). [read post]
