Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 1781 - 1800 of 23,685
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2023, 12:42 pm by Elaine Hou
Her primary argument was that, based on the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Title VI states: No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:57 am by James Romoser
When we asked it to name three noteworthy opinions of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Question #11), it started off strong: It identified (and correctly summarized) her majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 11:44 pm by Kevin
Democracy (such as it is) in the United States seems to have temporarily survived a violent attack on its legislature. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:16 pm by Gregory Forman
  Hearn’s opinion discusses United States Supreme Court jurisprudence at the time South Carolina adopted article I, section 10, noting that Griswold v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 11:21 am by Mark Walsh
  During that time, the court decided some major cases involving abortion, religious liberty, the president of the United States, student speech, the Second Amendment, and LGBTQ rights. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 10:32 am by Maria Morris
Silver issued a preliminary but sweeping remedial order, telling state officials what they must do to bring standards up to constitutional muster — and that the state will not weasel out of its constitutional obligations this time. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 9:21 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1993) ("[T]he question is not, as the United States would have it, whether [a monetary penalty] is civil or criminal, but rather whether it is punishment. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 8:09 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Here is her summary: This case concerns the effective date of an award of disability compensation to a veteran of the United States military. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
: The Enduring Role of Pope Alexander VI’s Inter caetera in Spanish Colonization, (CSLR Research Paper No.1.2023-AFF).Francis Beckwith, Dignitatis Humanae and the Challenges of the New Modern World, (January 6, 2023).Jeremy Kessler, The Legal Origins of Catholic Conscientious Objection, (William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2022).From SSRN (Abortion Rights):Dinah Aryeh, Dennis Chen, Arianne Juin Raymond & Nara Sandberg, The Economic… [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
United States, the Court rejected the government's contention that the NY Times and Washington Post could be enjoined from publishing the Pentagon Papers, which Daniel Ellsberg had leaked. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm by Francis Pileggi
  The sole member followed the advice of Skadden and caused the Boardwalk MLP general partner to exercise the call right and acquire all the public units pursuant to a formula in the Partnership Agreement. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 8:19 am by John Floyd
Supreme Court in June 1992 established the “Daubert Rule” in its landmark decision Daubert v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:14 pm by Gregory Forman
Finally, the United States code section regarding personal jurisdiction for dividing military retirement overrides South Carolina’s long-arm statute. [read post]