Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 9,489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2009, 8:56 pm
The constitutional issues were previously decided by the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:36 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:29 am
Today is rumoured to be National Bilski Day in the United States (if you've never heard of Bernard L. [read post]
11 May 2022, 2:32 pm
Background and analysis of the Judgment are provided by Comparative Patent Remedies.In the United States, there is a new development in the Epic Games v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 6:35 am
It is up to United Laboratories to police the mark. [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:38 am
The pending appeal before the Supreme court of the United States is styled Susan K. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Some of these activities spill over into the United States, and just in 2020, three men were arrested in Texas transporting illicit cigarettes. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:03 pm
The book not only enlightens the reader as to the approach of the Indian legal system to the scope of these rights and their protection but also discusses the law in common law jurisdictions such as the United States, United Kingdom, Singapore and Australia. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:04 pm
United States, 2012 U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:26 am
The same bottle was subsequently registered as a trade mark in Japan and a number of other countries, including Member States of the European Union. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 2:30 pm
Knotts and United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:36 pm
A trademark owner can save time, expense, and effort by adopting an inherently distinctive mark and ensuring it is registered on the Principal Register with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
In the case of Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 3:53 am
The Court was also “troubled” that defendants were offering to sell contact lenses into the United States using Mon Ros’ AZURE and AMARILLO marks. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:00 pm
United States, No. 10-14235 (11th Cir. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
UPDATED: June 21, 2010 at 11:55 am Straight from the Broken Record department, the United States Supreme Court has again not issued a decision in Bilski v. [read post]
