Search for: "United States v. Marshall" Results 1781 - 1800 of 2,250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2016, 8:58 am by familoo
UNITED STATES OF … and this one : Another Marvel in the Inbox – – Crossroads – WordPress.com :-p [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 10:20 am by Amy Howe
United States, a tax case in which the justices are likely to hear argument in December, because Rivkin represents the petitioner in the case. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:13 am by Rick Garnett
Breyer served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States for nearly three decades. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 11:15 am by Lyle Denniston
United States); and a request to sort out a conflict among lower courts on when a bankrupt’s debts are barred from being forgiven because of fraud (Husky International Electronics v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am by Broc Romanek
Respondents' Argument US Solicitor General Elena Kagan argued the case for the United States, which previously intervened in the case. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:07 am
Bomber command, however, General Henry Arnold reorganized the USAAF in Europe and set up the United States Strategic Air Forces in December 1943. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 10:46 am by royblack
Wifredo Ferrer, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida (and an excellent public speaker), focused on fraud in Florida. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:28 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
“As part of the nation’s health care system, Medicare serves vulnerable populations,” said United States Attorney, Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 4:24 pm
First, those responsible for the discovery violation were not the prosecutors, but representatives of the United States Marshals service, who did not intentionally commit a discovery violation; indeed, they had "no idea they were" obligated to produce the tapes. [read post]