Search for: "Weeks v. State of Me."
Results 1781 - 1800
of 7,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2010, 4:55 am
The case is interesting to me because it’s one of the first looking at the reformulated real and substantial connection test in Van Breda v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:49 am
It would have been impossible for Respect the Look to give Expeditee “three weeks to decide whether to withdraw the supposedly offending pleading [and motion],” which is the purpose of Rule 11’s safe harbor. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
Before proceeding to phone it in flagrantly, let me pause just long enough to note that with the Supreme Court putting partisan-gerrymander case Gill v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am
I talked to Manmeet Singh, one of Virender Singh’s lawyers, and he confirmed for me that the charges were dismissed; he also sent me a copy of the motion. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
What percentage of cases get reversed when the case goes from the Federal appellate court to the SCOTUS.What got me thinking about this was when I read a recent opinion (Small v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
What percentage of cases get reversed when the case goes from the Federal appellate court to the SCOTUS.What got me thinking about this was when I read a recent opinion (Small v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:47 am
This my fourth post this week on the UK Supreme Court hearing in Unwired Planet v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:16 am
., Jr. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:28 am
Ericsson v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help… [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:50 am
State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:41 am
So let me just start with that. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
And if the Court does take up the case (which seems like a decent bet), then the case will be fully briefed this summer and argued sometime this fall, with a decision due out in 2023.If review is granted, there will of course be time for additional commentary, but for now let me highlight one aspect of the Reply brief filed last week that continues to be disappointing. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 10:31 am
New York Blawger Andrew Lavoot Bluestone, who writes the New York Attorney Malpractice Blog, was found liable last week by the First Department for impermissible advertising prohibited by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (47 USC § 227) (Stern v Bluestone, 2008 NY Slip Op 00611). [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 3:45 am
In State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm
In 1914, in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:00 am
Circuit decision, which affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the antitrust suit by 46 states, the District of Columbia, and Guam against Facebook (aka Meta) in State of New York v. [read post]
Opinion analysis: Justices reject Missouri’s push to expand insurance benefits for federal employees
18 Apr 2017, 10:40 am
No surprises in this morning’s opinion in Coventry Health Care v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:21 pm
Since last week was light, I previewed a couple nonrelisted cases that struck me as likely grants. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 1:02 pm
‘The defendant’s submission on this point does not seem to me to belong to the real world of this litigation,’ it states. [read post]
