Search for: "Winners Corporation" Results 1781 - 1800 of 2,337
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2010, 10:37 pm by Andrew Jorges
” Related posts:Cardozo Moot Court Team Breezes Its Way to Victory in the Windy City Moot Court Team Prepares to Battle SCOTUS Review: Roberts Court Pro-Corporate Perception Persists [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:08 pm by LindaMBeale
  And it is a failure that reinforces the "winner-take-all" nature of politics and tax policy that has resulted in banksters making millions while millions of ordinary Americans suffer. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:44 pm by Mandelman
Garfield, M.B.A., J.D., 61, is the winner of dozens of academic awards, a popular speaker, and author of technical treatises on law and economics. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:56 am by Elie Mystal
” That’s right, the Supreme Court decided the winner of a popular presidential election, and one of the architects of that decision wants people to not care about it anymore. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:57 am by Jon Sands
That is, in Santos, the illegal lottery paid proceeds to winners, and was not money laundering. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 10:05 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
”        Justice Holland noted that Dodd emerged as the winner of that debate as supported by Delaware’s judicial decisions which differentiate between three different scenarios: (i) the day-to-day operations of a corporation; (ii) the hostile takeover situation and (iii) and the sale of the corporation. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Mandelman
I fought it in the courts for eight months before making the decision to do what we should have done in Viet Nam… I declared myself a winner and quit. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:05 am by Ted Frank
:We study attorney fee clauses in a data set of 2,350 contracts contained as exhibits in Form 8-K filings by reporting corporations. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:30 am by GuestPost
Leonard suggests additional reasons for the community’s opposition, including a ‘local duty to defend families and property; the unsavoury behaviour of Shell and the government; the misrepresentation of facts on the issue; and the prioritisation of corporate profits over local concerns. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:24 pm by William Birdthistle
 At least four justices, then, appear to have a particular craving for this case, which perhaps bodes ill for the winner in the court below: the plaintiff. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:11 am by Stefanie Levine
There would be no winners, only losers, but that hasn't stopped the Supreme Court from doing the wrong thing in the past. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:11 am by Stefanie Levine
There would be no winners, only losers, but that hasn't stopped the Supreme Court from doing the wrong thing in the past. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:32 am by Gene Quinn
  There would be no winners, only losers, but that hasn’t stopped the Supreme Court from doing the wrong thing in the past. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 5:55 am by Jake Linford
Suellenpost suggests the winner of the ebook market will be the company that figures out rental services for ebooks. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 5:55 am by Jake Linford
Suellenpost suggests the winner of the ebook market will be the company that figures out rental services for ebooks. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 1:19 am by war
See for example Re Cooper’s Application for a Patent (1901) 19 RPC 53 and Re Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corporation’s Application (1958) RPC 35). [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 7:13 am by Daniel Shaviro
Winners are rewarded for becoming more powerful, while losers are punished for having become less so. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 6:00 pm by Frank Pasquale
Trends are self-limiting; winners eventually lose; a coin can't keep coming up heads forever. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm by Mandelman
Yeah, I know… it’s been several months since my last Monthly Museletter. [read post]