Search for: "Brown v. State Bar" Results 1801 - 1820 of 1,983
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2008, 8:48 am
Justice Department drew upon letter from Secretary of State Dean Acheson in its brief in Brown v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:57 am
The Roberts Court declared in Brown v Chamber of Commerce last term that California could not place anti-union-busting conditions on California's own state money. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
(The lead case amog six appeals is Kiyemba v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1351 n.2 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 5:30 pm
" NFP criminal opinions today (2): State of Indiana v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:25 pm
Goldner, No. 07-10711 Dismissal of a debt-collection action as time-barred is affirmed where a state statute tolling the limitations period against out-of-state defendants imposed burdens on interstate commerce in excess of its local benefits, and thereby violated the Commerce Clause. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
Maxine Huff, et al. , a 13-page opinion, Judge Brown writes:Lloyd N. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]