Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 11,616
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2007, 1:13 pm
For publication opinions today (0): NFP civil opinions today (1): Loren Cooper, Brenda Cooper, et al v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:57 am
Out-of-title work Article 78 petition dismissed for failure to exhaust remedy provided in the collective bargaining agreementCSEA v Groton Cent. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:38 am
In Miller v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:49 am
v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:49 am
v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 2:13 pm
Mid-Central Educational Cooperative (Indian Education)U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Again, Payne v Cooper is cited in support. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 5:42 am
In Cooper v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 11:43 am
Cooper. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:00 am
In Cox v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:05 pm
Cooper (1881) 59 Cal. 703, 706 (plur. opn.), 709 (conc. opn.) [read post]
7 May 2009, 10:16 am
Supreme Court's holding in Cooper v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:15 pm
In the case of Rush v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 8:00 pm
In DeLaune v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
Munley in the case of Noone v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:45 am
In the case of Murphy v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:39 am
The Court is just not cooperating though! [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:10 pm
Peretti, The New Brazilian BIT on Cooperation and Facilitation of Investments: A New Approach in Times of Change Sungjin Kang, Conflict of Investment-Related Provisions under Regional Trade Agreements between Korea and China – Navigating the ‘Noodle Bowl’ Anthony C. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:20 pm
Slip Op. 05760 (2d Dept., 2017) the parties stipulation provided that the defendant was entitled to 50% of the marital portion of the plaintiff’s pension and that the parties were to cooperate with each other in obtaining a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) to divide the pension, that they would equally share the cost of preparing the QDRO, and that the defendant’s share would be determined pursuant to the formula set forth in Majauskas v. [read post]
