Search for: "COOPER v. STATE"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 7,410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2007, 5:37 am
§ 1983 and various state-law tort claims. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
” State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 9:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
Ind. Decisions - Sentence of Pendleton woman for shooting her husband to death while he slept upheld
1 May 2008, 8:31 am
Yesterday's COA opinion in the NFP criminal case, Kathy Jo Ward v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:31 pm
Joseph v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 5:04 am
In UNITED STATES v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 3:43 pm
In State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
Servs. v State Farm Mut. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:57 am
Cooper’s latest petition was 09-363 (Cooper v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 3:47 am
A curious note in initial coverage of the matter of NY v DSK was the claim that the United States and France have no extradition treaty.Could that be? [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 1:29 pm
See Saada v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:50 am
Pierce v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:48 pm
Not having them would introduce uncertainty, and that would hinder cooperation, the very thing that certain states say they desire by virtue of the treaty, and also cause risk to human rights, most importantly. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
The outcome of State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
In People v McCullough, the case pending at the Court of Appeals, the issue will be whether a cooperating witness’s testimony provided adequate corroboration to the eyewitness testimony.In light of these cases, if you have a case that turns on identification evidence, you should certainly explore the possibility of making a motion to introduce expert testimony. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
In People v McCullough, the case pending at the Court of Appeals, the issue will be whether a cooperating witness’s testimony provided adequate corroboration to the eyewitness testimony.In light of these cases, if you have a case that turns on identification evidence, you should certainly explore the possibility of making a motion to introduce expert testimony. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:37 pm
In Garcetti v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
Times highlights the Court’s decision denying cert. in Cooper v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:25 am
In Speranza v. [read post]
