Search for: "Doe 35" Results 1801 - 1820 of 17,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2010, 11:01 am by Walton Law Firm
" Heritage Rehabilitation Center is a 161 bed facility that has been in operation for more than 35 years. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:37 pm by Laura Orr
Another story (see the 4/16/10 one about the erroneous safety corridor designation) about a driver who does the research - and finds out that posted speed limit has been wrong since 1980.Oregonian story: "Driver fights her way out of Milwaukie speed trap”, April 18, 2010:Excerpt: “…Miles said she couldn't believe she was going much faster than 35 mph, and she was right. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 8:00 pm
In many cases, where contract language is clear and explicit and does not lead to an unacceptable result, a court will ascertain contractual intent from the written provisions of the contract itself and go no further. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 12:46 pm
On June 9, 2009, the Department of Energy (“DOE”) re-opened a Funding Opportunity Announcement (“FOA”) related to the Clean Coal Power Initiative (“CCPI”). [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 5:00 am
The Military Times did report that 35% of respondents said they were Protestant, 29% were Catholic, 7% were Evangelical Christian, 2% were Mormon, 1% were Jewish, 0% were Muslim, 13% were Other, and 12% had No Preference. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 7:15 am
Holding a Survivor-like contest to determine who will be recommended for a promotion to regional manager does not pass this test. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:29 am by Mike Gertler
At The Gertler Law Firm, we’ve helped people in New Orleans facing a mesothelioma diagnosis for more than 35 years. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:50 pm
”  Additionally, defense counsel need to make sure the jury knows that just because there is a line on the verdict form for a specific type of damage does not mean the plaintiff is entitled to an award for that damage. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:48 am by Dennis Crouch
— The determination by the Director whether to institute an inter partes review under this section shall be final and nonappealable. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 7:52 am by Docket Navigator
Simply because a claimed invention offers benefits within a particular technological environment does not mean that it improves technology itself. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:52 am by Docket Navigator
[E]ven though plaintiff may have been the first to 'see' [the enzyme] by looking at the amount of [the enzyme] molecules and/or the enzymatic activity level, these values are naturally occurring and their discovery does not render the patents eligible under § 101. [read post]
10 May 2019, 8:53 am by Dennis Crouch
  However, the court did issue a statement that recall was “unnecessary” because the “mandate does not alter how the district court should decide the preclusive effect of the T-Mobile ruling, which did not exist in May 2017. [read post]