Search for: "Doe v. State"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 93,787
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2007, 5:07 am
State. v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 8:51 am
How does that play into this? [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 7:52 am
The case is State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:52 am
Spoerle v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 8:30 am
Does 1-4, Atlantic v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 9:27 am
Fofana v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 2:05 pm
The majority relied heavily on State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
In Kahler v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:11 pm
Justice Alito’s opinion in Murphy v. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 8:33 am
Semelik v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
In its 8-0 decision in Williamson v Mazda Motor of America, Inc. earlier this year, the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
In Locke v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am
Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:26 pm
In Mick Haig Productions v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:12 pm
Summerlin, however, does not settle the matter of Hurst’s retroactivity. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 4:41 pm
See Touhy v. [read post]
