Search for: "Does, 1-20" Results 1801 - 1820 of 27,685
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2014, 9:17 pm
Aug. 1, 2014).Issues[1] [A]ll asserted claims of the ’065 Patent require the use of accounting information to “enhance” a network accounting record. [read post]
  [1] Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil Corporation (DC Cir, 8 July 2011) slip op, page 53 (Rogers J) [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:34 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
(“LG”), a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 – 10, infringed its intellectual property rights, including the right of publicity. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 2:12 am
But this "wedge issue" does create a problem when it comes time to sell the new media deal to the other two guilds. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The rule states:“If the Board of Appeal notes that the appeal does not comply with R 99, paragraph 1(a), it shall communicate this to the appellant and shall invite him to remedy the deficiencies noted within a period to be specified. [read post]
26 May 2018, 5:03 am
;The duration of this new right would be 1 year [instead of 20 years, as originally proposed by the Commission] from the publication of the press publication (Art 11(4));The new right would not have retroactive effect (Art 11(5)).Value gap proposal (Art 13)Unlike the initial Commission’s text, the Coreper version explicitly refers to the E-commerce Directive (Recital 4), clarifying that the DSM Directive is based upon and complements the rules contained also therein;The… [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:12 am by WSLL
Stat, 20-1-101 and 20-1-111. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
On 20 June 2018, the board summoned the appellant to oral proceedings. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 3:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
Poly Prep Country Day Sch., No. 20 Civ. 4718, 2022 WL 4586237, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:37 pm
” Id. at *7 (internal citations omitted).Rule 20“[However, because] Rule 21 does not provide a standard for district courts to apply in deciding whether parties or claims are misjoined … ‘courts have looked to Rule 20 for guidance. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The board shares the OD’s view that the introduction of this feature into claim 1 does not contravene A 123(2). [read post]