Search for: "Does 1 - 10"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 43,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2023, 7:18 am
The city of Los Angeles’s recently passed Fair Workweek Ordinance (the Ordinance) takes effect April 1, 2023. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:19 am
The NACDL amicus brief does an excellent job on this. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:48 am
"The Board therefore affirmed the refusal to register under Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Lanham Act.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: I wonder what percentage of the goods sold at Wal-Mart are made in America? [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:30 am
Judge Dyk’s dissenting opinion in this case explains that “[t]he only material difference between [Chemours] claim 1 and Kaulbach is that Kaulbach discloses (in Sample A11) a melt flow rate of 24 g/10 min, slightly lower than 27 g/10 min, the lower bound of the 30 ± 3 g/10 min rate claimed in claim 1 of the ’609 patent. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:42 am
On March 10, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Klooster v City of Charlevoix. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:30 am
Id. at 1. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:08 pm
For a free, confidential, detailed evaluation with a motorcycle lawyer, please call Ledger & Associates @ 1-800-300-0001 or visit the firm’s website for more information @ www.ledgerlaw.com. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 3:07 pm
Specifically, the state argues that the violation was statutory rather than constitutional in nature and, therefore, does not justify suppression of the evidence. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 2:46 pm
As discussed in an August 10, 2017 memo by the Simpson Thacher law firm on the CLS Blue Sky Blog entitled “Combatting Securities Fraud with 10b5-1 Trading Plans” (here), “sales made under 10b5-1 plans can substantially assist a company in getting such a claim dismissed by helping to rebut the inference of scienter that normally results when plaintiffs present evidence of insider stock sales during the class period. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 of all of the requests was identical to claim 1 filed on May 2, 2005. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:03 am
Over at Seth's Blog, Seth Godin does his standard, masterful job of re-thinking big-picture issues with a post today entitled, "Goodbye to the Office. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:23 am
11-1: the Court’s Achilles heel The stand-out message emerging fro [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am
However, this does not reduce the intensity of attacks by the occupiers,” Mariupol mayoral aide Petro Andryushchenko wrote on Telegram. [read post]
18 May 2022, 6:04 am
It went up at 1:13 a.m. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:30 am
” (P. 1.) [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
This does not exclude other examples of an unwarranted advantage. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:13 am
So, here are 10 things a 40 year bankruptcy law veteran wishes personal finance writers would get right. 1. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:59 am
But when does a bad boss break the law? [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:44 am
Point 1 is run under s. 10(1) Trade Marks Act 1994 (TMA 1994) i.e. a double identity infringement claim. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:26 am
September 10, 2010) (unpublished).* Considering the four factor Dunn curtilage test, the garage fairly separate from defendant’s house was not part of the curtilage. [read post]
