Search for: "Does 1-88"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 2,128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2010, 6:16 am
Of particular note, in December, the Securities and Exchange Commission (”SEC”) adopted new proxy disclosure rules that likely will be a focal point for public company directors, as the new rules relate to disclosures regarding the composition and operation of boards of directors. [1] This memorandum is an update of our client alert covering considerations for public company directors in the current environment issued on October 15, 2009. 1. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:11 pm
Nowhere does the Penal Law state that "outsiders" or "third parties" not employed by or agents of the recipient enterprise are immune from prosecution under this statute. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am
The legislative history should thus allow the normal canons of statutory construction to operate: (1) that subsequent statutes/amendments are presumed harmonious with existing law; (2) that statutes capable of co-existence should be read to effectuate both; (3) disfavoring “absurd” results; and (4) disfavoring implied repeals. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 8:28 am
In July, a specially appointed committee of the West Virginia legislature (study resolution HCR 88) heard testimony on whether the legislature should approve such an amendment. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 7:33 am
BancAmerica Commercial Corp. (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th 816, 826.) [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
Corp., 1 AD3d 424, 426). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
Examples include: (1) The $13 fee for machine-readable BCCs for certain Mexican citizen minors, Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1999, Public Law 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681-50, Div. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:50 am
Arrigo, 88 N.J. 529, 545 (1982)). [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 9:09 am
It is a 1 to 10 scale and higher is better. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:05 am
We need to be careful that “Too Big to Fail” does not become a self-fulfilling prophecy. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:32 pm
S.206(1)(c) deals with the provision of accommodation under s.193 and does not qualify s.192. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:32 pm
S.206(1)(c) deals with the provision of accommodation under s.193 and does not qualify s.192. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:54 am
Marie Long once had a net worth above $1 million dollars. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:01 am
Bavarian Brewing Co., 264 F.2d 88, 92 (6th Cir. 1959)). [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm
The identification of this effect however does not require any ingenuity. [2.5] Therefore, the use as defined in claim 1 in accordance with the auxiliary request does not involve an inventive step as required by A 56. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:54 pm
At what point does someone stop and say, Whoa? [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 8:33 am
In From Creativity to Computerese: Thinking Like a Lawyer in the Computer Age, 88 Law Libr. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:32 am
Super. at 287-88. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 11:01 am
However, J 8/80 [4] stated that “for the purposes of R 88 a mistake may be said to exist in a document filed with the EPO if the document does not express the true intention of the person on whose behalf it was filed” (i.e. the applicant). [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm
As Stevens observes, most investors don't owns shares of individual companies--our household does, but apparently we're a rarity. [read post]
