Search for: "Does 1-96"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 2,165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2010, 3:41 pm
That means these liquors are 96 percent alcohol and are believed to be the strongest drinks available in the state. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:52 pm
The reason should be clear: does your firm only offer one type of legal practice? [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 9:37 am
A resolution: European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 June 2010 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Earth observation programme (GMES) and its initial operations (2011–2013) (COM(2009)0223 – C7-0037/2009 – 2009/0070(COD)) (Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading) The European Parliament, – having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2009)0223), – having regard… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Dissent, slip op. at 1 n.1.) [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:57 pm
This is above the national average of 85% insured.Only 1% of the states residents were assessed a penalty for non-compliance with the state mandate that everyone have health insurance. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:00 am
See 20 C.F.R. 404.1527(d)(2) and Social Security Ruling 96-2p.So what does one do when the claimant is being treated by a "non-acceptable" medical source? [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm
Nothing is clear to him who does not want to understand (and opponents very often are not desirous to understand, are they?). [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 11:52 am
”1. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:00 am
In the Irish context the Children Act 2001, per section 96(2), states that “a period of detention should be imposed only as a measure of last resort”. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:46 pm
., 96 N.J. 336, 343 (1984). [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:15 am
Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill does not propose a damages cap or the power to order the publication of an apology. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm
Pursuant A 64(2) and in view of the fact that granted claim 1 does not comprise any feature defining this manufacturing process in detail (see [6.3.3] above) the protection conferred by this claim would cover any pharmaceutical preparation comprising any botulinum neurotoxin. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:12 pm
Does this seem like a viable and sensible alternative for retirees with a similar risk profile? [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
96/03 and C? [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:47 am
Here's how he did it: [1] Does Florida's Probate Code permit the filing of class action claims against a decedent's estate? [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:41 am
The Defendant moved to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), claiming it was sovereign immune from such claims. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 12:38 pm
The question is why does the original acquistion cost have to be so expensive for the annuitant? [read post]
29 May 2010, 3:04 pm
What sort of ethics does a company like Woodbridge have when on the one hand it scares the crap out of annuitants about the safety of insurance companies and on the other hand brags about the financial security of the same companies to get investors to buy the deals. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:51 pm
Cir. 2007). 1. [read post]
28 May 2010, 5:00 am
Impairment rating for injuries after 10/1/00 are as follows: 0-5% $ 75,000 6-10% 80,000 11-15% 85,000 16-20% 90,000 21-25% 95,000 26-30% 100,000 31-35% 110,000 36-40% 120,000 41-45% 130,000 46-50% 140,000 51-55% 165,000 56-60% 190,000 61-65% 215,000 66-70% 240,000 71-75% 265,000 76-80% 315,000 81-85% 365,000 86-90% 415,000 91-95% 465,000 96-100% 515,000 Now,… [read post]
