Search for: "Does v. United States of America" Results 1801 - 1820 of 4,684
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2017, 10:38 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
United States of America (Case No. 1:14-cv-01523-RCL) that the IRS could continue to require the use of PTINs for tax preparers but the Court also ruled that the IRS was not allowed to charge for PTINs. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
  The new school of political economy that he created at the University of Virginia was “meant to train a new generation of thinkers to push back against Brown [v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It’s disturbing, to say the least.Perhaps the United States will never be Gilead. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:43 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States of America, No. 15-11877(September 26, 2017)Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of AlabamaPanel: Ed Carnes, Chief Judge, Rosenbaum and Dubina, Circuit JudgesEd Carnes, Chief Judge: Reversed and RemandedThe full text of the decision can be found here:http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201511877.pdfFighting for you or a friend. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
The highest-profile grant of the day came in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Does the notice-and-takedown process sufficiently address the reappearance of infringing material previously removed by a service provider in response to a notice? [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
For example, a case with a caption like United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The New War on ContraceptionThere was a long era in which the law made it difficult, if not impossible, to access contraception in the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
Does the notice-and-takedown process sufficiently address the reappearance of infringing material previously removed by a service provider in response to a notice? [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am by John Elwood
First among them is Scenic America, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 11:28 am by Rachel Sandler
Today’s en banc decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Aqua Products, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:48 pm by Joseph Fishkin
  Just as critics at the time feared, the new doctrine swept across the national landscape, invalidating the districting maps in nearly every jurisdiction in the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:03 am by danny
It does not afford EU citizens fundamental protection. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 6:00 am by Michael Risch
With the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:41 am by Lyle Denniston
   His case, to which a state court applied the “automobile exception,” does not even involve a car, but rather a motorcycle. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:26 am by Morten Lund
(later joined by SolarWorld Americas, Inc.) pursuant to Sections 201-202 of the Trade Act of 1974. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:26 am by Morten Lund
(later joined by SolarWorld Americas, Inc.) pursuant to Sections 201-202 of the Trade Act of 1974. [read post]